Judeans and Jews: Four Faces of Dichotomy in Ancient Jewish History

In writing in English about the classical era, is it more appropriate to refer to "Jews" or to "Judeans"? What difference does it make? Today, many scholars consider "Judeans" the more authentic term, and "Jews" and "Judaism" merely anachronisms.

InJudeans and Jews, Daniel R. Schwartz argues that we need both terms in order to reflect the dichotomy between the tendencies of those, whether in Judea or in the Disapora, whose identity was based on the state and the land (Judeans), and those whose identity was based on a religion and culture (Jews).

Presenting the Second Temple era as an age of transition between a territorial past and an exilic and religious future,Judeans and Jewsnot only sharpens our understanding of this important era but also sheds important light on the revolution in Jewish identity caused by the creation of the modern state of Israel.

Table of Contents:
Introduction
I. Judean Historiography vs. Jewish Historiography: The First and Second Books of Maccabees
II. Priestly Judaism vs. Rabbinic Judaism
III. From Joseph b. Mattathias, a Priest of Judea, to Flavius Josephus, a Jew of Rome
IV. Judeans, Jews, and the Era that Disappeared: On Heinrich Graetz’s Evolving Treatment of the Second Temple Period
Conclusion
Appendix: May We Speak of “Religion” and “Judaism” in the Second Temple Period?