The Two Sins of Nob: Biblical Interpretation, an Anti-Priestly Polemic and a Geographical Error in 'Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum'

Research notes: 
Reader Checked 19/06/2013 SE
Reference type: 
Journal Article
Author(s): 
Regev, Eyal
year: 
2001
Full title: 

The Two Sins of Nob: Biblical Interpretation, an Anti-Priestly Polemic and a Geographical Error in 'Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum'

Translated title: 
Journal / Book Title || Series Title: 
Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha
Volume: 
12
Issue / Series Volume: 
1
Number of volumes: 
0
Series Title: 
Abbreviated Series Name: 
Collaborating Author: 
Place of Publication: 
Publisher: 
Pages: 
85-104
Chapter: 
Work type: 
Abstract: 

According to LiberAntiquitatum Biblicarum (LAB) the priests of Nob were punished for their cultic sins. This unusual claim was influenced by the fact that there is no reference to Saul's sin and punishment in the book of Sam uel. Indeed, this incident remains without explanation in the rabbinic sources. By putting the blame on Nob's priests the author of LAB was influenced by the motif of the evil priests, a theme common in the Pseudepigrapha and the Qumran writings. Another diversion from the biblical text is the assertion in LAB that the case of 'the concubine in Gibeah' actually happened in Nob and not in Gibeah! The author mistakenly replaced Gibeah ('the hill') with the hill of Nob since the two locations are very close geographically. Conse quently, this article suggests that the interchange between Gibeah and Nob may indicate that the author of LAB saw Gibeah or Nob with his own eyes.

Notes: 
Language: 
Alternative title: 
JSP
Date: 
Primary Texts: Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha: 
Composition / Author: 
Biblical Antiquities
Passage: 
45
Composition / Author: 
Biblical Antiquities
Passage: 
63
Edition: 
Original Publication: 
Reprint edition: 
URL: 
http://jsp.sagepub.com/content/12/1/85.full.pdf+html
DOI: 
ISBN: 
Accession number: 
Call num: 
Label: 
16/07/2001
Record number: 
18 489