Do Josephus’s Writings Support the ‘Essene Hypothesis’?

Research notes: 
reader checked 28/08/2012 AL
Reference type: 
Journal Article
Author(s): 
Atkinson, Kenneth
Eshel, Hanan
Magness, Jodi
year: 
2009
Full title: 

Do Josephus’s Writings Support the ‘Essene Hypothesis’?

Translated title: 
Journal / Book Title || Series Title: 
Biblical Archaeology Review
Volume: 
35
Issue / Series Volume: 
2
Number of volumes: 
0
Series Title: 
Abbreviated Series Name: 
Collaborating Author: 
Place of Publication: 
Publisher: 
Pages: 
56-59
Chapter: 
Work type: 
Abstract: 

In a recent issue of BAR, Steve Mason challenges the traditional "Essene hypothesis"--the belief that the Dead Sea scrolls and the archaeological site of Qumran are connected with the Essenes--based on the writings of Josephus. Accusing scholars of being "less sensitive to the nuances of Josephus's historical narratives," he argues that the authors of the Dead Sea Scrolls remain a mystery. Here, Atkinson et al explain why with the exception of the scrolls themselves, Josephus remains the best evidence in support of the "Essene hypothesis." They assert that both of Josephus's two great works, The Antiquities of the Jews and The Jewish War, as well as his autobiographical Life, reveal his fascination with the Essenes. Mason's article gives the impression that Josephus merely uses the Essenes to illustrate the manliness of the Judeans. In Josephus's famous description of the major forms of Judaism in his Jewish War (2.119-161), he devotes 43 paragraphs out of 47 to the Essenes, leaving only two to the majority Pharisees and one to the Sadducees.

Notes: 
Language: 
Alternative title: 
BAR
Date: 
Edition: 
Original Publication: 
Reprint edition: 
URL: 
DOI: 
ISBN: 
Accession number: 
Call num: 
Label: 
31/08/2009
Record number: 
14 974