Two Rabbinic Inclinations? Rethinking a Scholarly Dogma

Research notes: 
reader checked 01/03/2012 AL
Reference type: 
Journal Article
Author(s): 
Rosen-Zvi, Ishay
year: 
2008
Full title: 

Two Rabbinic Inclinations? Rethinking a Scholarly Dogma

Translated title: 
Journal / Book Title || Series Title: 
Journal for the Study of Judaism
Volume: 
39
Issue / Series Volume: 
4-5
Number of volumes: 
0
Series Title: 
Abbreviated Series Name: 
Collaborating Author: 
Place of Publication: 
Publisher: 
Pages: 
513-539
Chapter: 
Work type: 
Abstract: 

The scholarly consensus on the Rabbinic concept of the yetzer (inclination) takes for granted the existence of two yetzarim, good and evil, in every person. Some have noticed the marginality of the good yetzer in rabbinic discourse, as well as the fact that most sources discuss only one yetzer, but ascribed it to the inherent imbalance of power between the two yetzarim. In this paper I wish to rethink this scholarly consensus, while taking the single-yetzer model, which appears in almost all rabbinic sources, seriously. A systematic analysis of all rabbinic references to the yetzer, which attempts to distinguish as much as possible between sources, both chronologically (early or late), and geographically (Palestinian or Babylonian), yields a picture markedly different from the common view, and helps locate the (rather marginal) place of the two yetzarim in context of the rabbinic corpus in its entirety.

Notes: 
Language: 
Alternative title: 
JSJ
Date: 
Edition: 
Original Publication: 
Reprint edition: 
URL: 
http://haifaisr.library.ingentaconnect.com/content/brill/jsj/2008/00000039/F0020004/art00003
DOI: 
ISBN: 
Accession number: 
Call num: 
Label: 
13/10/2008
Record number: 
12 092