Milton and the Book of Enoch — An Alternative Hypothesis

Updated by: 
Charles Stover
Research notes: 
CS/not checked/04/12/2019
Reference type: 
Journal Article
Author(s): 
Williams, Arnold
year: 
1940
Full title: 

Milton and the Book of Enoch — An Alternative Hypothesis

Journal / Book Title || Series Title: 
Harvard Theological Review
Volume: 
33
Issue / Series Volume: 
4
Abbreviated Series Name: 
HTR
Pages: 
291-299
Work type: 
Essay/Monograph
Abstract: 

In an examination of the influence of the Book of Enoch on certain motifs in Milton's Paradise Lost, Mr. Grant McColley challenges the commonly accepted belief that Bruce was the first to restore to Western Civilization the knowledge of the existence of I Enoch, which had passed out of circulation during the early centuries of Christianity. Mr. McColley's belief that at least the existence of I Enoch was known to certain persons in the mid-seventeenth century and before rests on quotations from three popular travel books of the time: Sandys' Relation of a Journey (1615), Purchas His Pilgrimage (1613), and Peter Heylyn's Cosmography (1652). These authors all agree that the Ethiopians, or Abyssinians, had books containing the ‘oracles’ or ‘writings’ of the patriarch Enoch.

URL: 
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/milton-and-the-book-of-enoch-an-alternative-hypothesis/24FFAE636281360E96DF1CE91863445E
Record number: 
105 993