How Bel and the Serpent Went from Addition to Edition of Daniel

Updated by: 
Shiran Shevah
Research notes: 
SHS/not checked/04/07/2018
Reference type: 
Journal Article
Author(s): 
Borchardt, Francis
year: 
2018
Full title: 

How Bel and the Serpent Went from Addition to Edition of Daniel

Journal / Book Title || Series Title: 
Catholic Biblical Quarterly
Volume: 
80
Issue / Series Volume: 
3
Abbreviated Series Name: 
CBQ
Pages: 
409-428
Work type: 
Essay/Monograph
Abstract: 

The textual witnesses to the Book of Daniel are complex. They present a challenge to any scholar wishing to investigate the production and transmission of the book in the ancient world. The difficulties with the text are not limited to the twelve-chapter masoretic tradition but extend also to the so-called additions to Daniel. These not only appear in divergent locations within different editions and manuscripts but also appear in different forms. In this study, I argue that at least some of the differences between the Old Greek of Bel and the Serpent and the Theodotion edition of the story should be attributed to a pronounced interest on the part of Theodotion to link its version of the story to Daniel 6, the other story of Daniel in the lions' den. To prove this point I examine the introductory verses, the use of divine names, and the description of the lions' den.

Primary Texts: Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha: 
Composition / Author: 
Bel and the Dragon
URL: 
http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=33cef2a5-3a4e-4aae-8001-002c16d99d7b%40sessionmgr4006
Label: 
09/07/2018
Record number: 
103 728