An Indicative Definition of the Canon

Updated by: 
Shiran Shevah
Research notes: 
SHS/not checked/30/04/2017
Reference type: 
Book section
Author(s): 
Lim, Timothy H.
year: 
2017
Full title: 

An Indicative Definition of the Canon

Journal / Book Title || Series Title: 
When Texts are Canonized
Issue / Series Volume: 
359
Series Title: 
Brown Judaic Studies
Abbreviated Series Name: 
BJS
Editor(s): 
Timothy H. Lim
Kengo Akiyama
Place of Publication: 
Providence, Rhode Island
Publisher: 
Brown Judaic Studies
Pages: 
1-24
Work type: 
Essay/Monograph
Abstract: 

One cannot explain why one book is chosen over another book by a set of standards or norms. One must avoid the terminology of “criteria” and its connotation of an external standard. The canonical process was multifaceted and complex, both in the way that each community formulated its own understanding of authoritative scriptures and the rationale implied in the selection. We need to apply a different kind of logic to understand how the process worked in defining the canon by drawing on the conceptual resources of analytical philosophy on blurred definitions. The result of this process, the definition of the canon, is explained by indicative logic.

Label: 
08/05/2017
Record number: 
102 735