Sabbath Observance, Sabbath Innovation: The Hasmoneans and Their Legacy as Interpreters of the Law

Updated by: 
Neta Rozenblit
Research notes: 
NR\Reader checked\01/06/2015
Reference type: 
Journal Article
Author(s): 
Borchardt, Francis
year: 
2015
Full title: 

Sabbath Observance, Sabbath Innovation: The Hasmoneans and Their Legacy as Interpreters of the Law

Journal / Book Title || Series Title: 
Journal for the Study of Judaism
Volume: 
46
Issue / Series Volume: 
2
Abbreviated Series Name: 
JSJ
Pages: 
159-181
Work type: 
Essay/Monograph
Abstract: 

Both 1 Maccabees and 2 Maccabees portray the Sabbath law as a central point of contention during the struggle over Judean law and tradition in the second century bce (e.g., 1 Macc 1:41-50; 2 Macc 6:4-6). The Hasmonean family in particular is at times highlighted as holding the Sabbath in high regard (2 Macc 5:27). In every available source, there is no question of the commitment to the inherited traditions concerning the Sabbath. However, in two passages, 1 Macc 2:29-41 and 9:43-53, the Hasmoneans are portrayed as acting in a way supported by few extant writings associated with Judean legal tradition: they engage in battle on the Sabbath. First Maccabees presents this as innovation on the part of the Hasmoneans. Josephus, who summarizes these events based upon 1 Maccabees, even recognizes this decision as the basis for normative practice (Ant. 12.272-277). As several scholars (e.g., Bar Kochva, Weiss, Scolnic) have pointed out, this event could hardly have been the first time in Judean history the issue arose. They argue against this reading of the sources. This paper contends that the plain reading of the texts is correct and 1 Maccabees is being used as the basis for legal practice in Josephus’ writings.

Primary Texts: Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha: 
Composition / Author: 
1 Maccabees
Passage: 
2
URL: 
http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/15700631-12340102
Label: 
22/06/2015
Record number: 
100 577