Language and Group Identity in the Dead Sea Scrolls: the Case for an “Essene Hebrew”

Updated By
Research notes

OT/not checked/25/04/2021

Reader checked/TC/29/12/2025

Reference type
Author(s)
Schniedewind, William M.
Editor(s)
Steven Fassberg
Year
2021
Journal / Book Title || Series Title
Hebrew Texts and Language of the Second Temple Period: Proceedings of an Eighth Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira
Issue / Series Volume
134
Series Title
Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah
Abbreviated Series Name
STDJ
Publisher
Brill
Place of Publication
Leiden
Pages
280-291
Work type
Language
Label
31/05/2021
Orion Center Library has physical copy
Abstract

The reasons for the label Essene Hebrew are twofold: first, writing—and specifically, orthography—is a result of social practice embedded in social groups. Orthographies are essential in defining and maintaining group boundaries. Second, the label “Essene” reflects a social group—albeit a broad, diverse, and complicated group. Such a broad and complex term better reflects the complexity of the sectarian documents of the Dead Sea Scrolls. In contrast, “Qumran” reflects a very narrow geographical area, which gives the misleading impression of a singular location and a less complicated system of beliefs. Ultimately, the rationale is simply that language, linguistic choices, writing systems, and orthography are central to group identities. And, the study of the Hebrew in the Dead Sea Scrolls should account for this in a more conscious way in our description of the language.