Pesher and Hypomnema: A Comparison of Two Commentary Traditions from the Hellenistic-Roman Period

Full title
Pesher and Hypomnema: A Comparison of Two Commentary Traditions from the Hellenistic-Roman Period
Updated By
Research notes

SHS/not checked/05/12/2017|ECK/reader checked/28/01/2019

Reference type
Author(s)
Hartog, Pieter B.
Year
2017
Journal / Book Title || Series Title
Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah
Issue / Series Volume
121
Abbreviated Series Name
STDJ
Publisher
Brill
Place of Publication
Leiden
Work type
Label
18/12/2017
Abstract

In Pesher and Hypomnema Pieter B. Hartog compares ancient Jewish commentaries on the Hebrew Bible with papyrus commentaries on the Iliad. Hartog shows that members of the Qumran movement adopted classical commentary writing and adapted it to their own needs.

|

Plates
|Preliminary Material
|Introduction
|The Hypomnemata and the Pesharim as Expressions of Intellectual Culture
|Textual Scholarship and the Physicality of the Hypomnemata
|Textual Scholarship and the Physicality of the Pesharim
|A Bifold Structure
|Structure and Scholarship in the Hypomnemata
|Structure and Interpretation in the Pesharim
|Describing Hermeneutics
|A Hermeneutical Profile of the Hypomnemata
|A Hermeneutical Profile of the Pesharim
|Conclusion: Pesher and Hypomnema