עדים וזוממים: לתולדותיה של פרשנות הלכתית קדומה

Full title
עדים וזוממים: לתולדותיה של פרשנות הלכתית קדומה
Research notes

MDE/reader checked/13/02/2016

Reference type
Author(s)
Naeh, Shlomo
Shemesh, Aharon
Editor(s)
Ben-Dov, Jonathan
Kister, Menahem
Year
2015
Journal / Book Title || Series Title
מגילות: מחקרים במגילות מדבר יהודה [Meghillot: Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls]
Translated title
Deuteronomy 19:15–19 in the Damascus Document and Early Midrash
Issue / Series Volume
[יא-יב [11-12
Publisher
Haifa University Press, Bialik Institute, Hebrew University
Place of Publication
Jerusalem
Pages
293-315
Work type
Language
Label
15/02/2016
Abstract

Damascus Document 9:16–10:3—the sectarian rule of testimony—presents serious difficulties that have challenged scholars for years. In light of the evidence from Qumran Cave 4, we suggest an emendation and a new reading of the passage. This reading reflects an understanding of the pentateuchal laws of testimony in Deut 19:15–19 that is markedly different from the conventional reading of this biblical pericope and the established halakhah. A similar interpretation of the biblical passage is also echoed in early rabbinic sources, and may well be the key to understanding an enigmatic dispute between Simon ben Shataḥ and Judah ben Tabbai, recorded in Mekhilta de-Rabbi Ishmael to Exod 23:7. An earlier, less developed version of this article was published in Dead Sea Discoveries 20 (2013), pp. 179–199.