To What Extent Did Philo's Treatment of Enoch and the Giants Presuppose Knowledge of Enochic and Other Sources Preserved in the Dead Sea Scrolls?

Full title
To What Extent Did Philo's Treatment of Enoch and the Giants Presuppose Knowledge of Enochic and Other Sources Preserved in the Dead Sea Scrolls?
Updated By
Neta Rozenblit
Research notes

NR\Reader checked\21/04/2015

Reference type
Book section
Author(s)
Stuckenbruck, Loren T.
Year
2014
Journal / Book Title || Series Title
The Myth of Rebellious Angels: Studies in Second Temple Judaism and New Testament Texts
Issue / Series Volume
335
Series Title
Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 1
Abbreviated Series Name
WUNT 1
Publisher
Mohr Siebeck
Place of Publication
Tübingen
Pages
131-141
Work type
Essay/Monograph
Related keywords
Giants / De gigantibus / Gig.
Giants
Biblical Interpretation / Exegesis / Hermeneutics
Pseudo-Eupolemus
Book of Watchers (1 Enoch 1-36)
Treatise of Two Spirits
Original Publication
Stuckenbruck, Loren T. “To What Extent Did Philo’s Treatment of Enoch and the Giants Presuppose a Knowledge of the Enochic and Other Sources Preserved in the Dead Sea Scrolls?” Studia Philonica Annual 19 (2007) 131-142.
Record reference
To What Extent Did Philo’s Treatment of Enoch and the Giants Presuppose a Knowledge of the Enochic and Other Sources Preserved in the Dead Sea Scrolls?
The Myth of Rebellious Angels: Studies in Second Temple Judaism and New Testament Texts