'מכנף הארץ זְמִרֹת שמענו': מסורות מתנגשות בלשון המקרא בראי הבלשנות ההיסטורית

Full title
'מכנף הארץ זְמִרֹת שמענו': מסורות מתנגשות בלשון המקרא בראי הבלשנות ההיסטורית
Research notes

Reader Checked|AK

Reference type
Author(s)
Mizrahi, Noam
Editor(s)
Zer (Singer), Rafael I.
Ofer, Yosef
Year
2011
Journal / Book Title || Series Title
Israel - Linguistic Studies in the Memory of Israel Yeivin
Translated title
Colliding Traditions in Biblical Hebrew in Historical Linguistic Perspective
Number of volumes
0
Issue / Series Volume
6
Series Title
Publications of the Hebrew University Bible Project
Publisher
Magnes
Place of Publication
Jerusalem
Pages
341-354
Language
Label
01/08/2011
Abstract

The paper aims at tracing the linguistic history of the various derivatives of z-m-r—going back to three different Proto-Semitic roots (*z-m-r, *z-b-r, *ð-m-r) that fell together in Hebrew—paying special attention to the singular form zimra and the plural zemirot. The discussion illustrates how etymological analysis necessarily leads to a grammatical observation, namely, that the discrepancies in the vocalization of the singular vs. plural forms of the lexeme denoting “song, singing” point to a diachronic gap between two different phases of the language. This conclusion is corroborated by textual evidence culled from various non-Tiberian sources, which allows one to penetrate into older linguistic formations of the pertinent words. While the recent debate over diachronic (usually lexical) distinctions within Biblical Hebrew focuses mostly on the possibility of identifying early vs. late biblical texts, much less attention has been given to cases such as the one discussed in this paper. Our discussion reveals a diachronic grammatical gap between the consonantal text and the vocalization traditions, leading to the conclusion that the diachronic distinction is not limited to specific passages, but rather pervades throughout the entire MT in its present form. Thus, the combined testimony of both linguistic and textual information
|demonstrates the potential contribution of historical linguistics to the clarification of perplexing irregularities in the grammar of Biblical Hebrew and to the historical study of the Hebrew Bible.